ABSTRACT
Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a viral disease with a high morbidity and mortality by the FIP virus (FIPV, virulent feline coronavirus). Several antiviral drugs for FIP have been identified, but many of these are expensive and not available in veterinary medicine. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a drug approved by several countries to treat malaria and immune-mediated diseases in humans, and its antiviral effects on other viral infections (e.g., SARS-CoV-2, dengue virus) have been confirmed. We investigated whether HCQ in association with interferon-ω (IFN-ω) is effective for FIPV in vitro. A total of 100 µM of HCQ significantly inhibited the replication of types I and II FIPV. Interestingly, the combination of 100 µM of HCQ and 104 U/mL of recombinant feline IFN-ω (rfIFN-ω, veterinary registered drug) increased its antiviral activity against type I FIPV infection. Our study suggested that HCQ and rfIFN-ω are applicable for treatment of FIP. Further clinical studies are needed to verify the combination of HCQ and rIFN-ω will be effective and safe treatment for cats with FIP.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Coronavirus, Feline/drug effects , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacology , Interferon Type I/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/toxicity , Cats , Cell Line/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus, Feline/pathogenicity , Drug Combinations , Feline Infectious Peritonitis/drug therapy , Feline Infectious Peritonitis/virology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/veterinary , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/toxicity , Interferon Type I/therapeutic use , Interferon Type I/toxicity , VirulenceABSTRACT
Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is a complex viral agent that causes a variety of clinical manifestations in cats, commonly known as feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). It is recognized that FCoV can occur in two different serotypes. However, differences in the S protein are much more than serological or antigenic variants, resulting in the effective presence of two distinct viruses. Here, we review the distinct differences in the S proteins of these viruses, which are likely to translate into distinct biological outcomes. We introduce a new concept related to the non-taxonomical classification and differentiation among FCoVs by analyzing and comparing the genetic, structural, and functional characteristics of FCoV and the FCoV S protein among the two serotypes and FCoV biotypes. Based on our analysis, we suggest that our understanding of FIP needs to consider whether the presence of these two distinct viruses has implications in clinical settings.